|
|
David Atlas
|
President of D. Atlas & Co.,Inc. A family business established in 1898. Partner in Diamond & Gem Laboratories of America and consultant to Imagem, Inc. Past Interntional Chairman of the Gem & Jewelry Committee of ASA. Past Treasurer of the Philadelphia Jewelers Row Association. Currently Associate Director and Chair of the Ethics Committee of NAJA. Expert witness, consumer consultant, lecturer and appraiser.
|
Articles by this Author
»
Posting to Polygon members about Pricescope 11/11/04
I know there is an atmosphere of fear concerning Pricescope apparent in some of the postings on Polygon. Now, this is not universal, as occasionally someone will post that they have decided to participate with Pricescope. Many diamond vendors on Polygon do list their merchandise in many places on the Internet anyway. They just remain mum on the issue. What can they say that would be welcomed? They can’t win in this. They need to turn goods rapidly, as the profits are so short. Pricescope is offering a new way for consumers, those who shop the Internet, to interact with B&M retail stores. These stores may not like the profit structure, but they need to compete for these sales to Internet savvy consumers, if they want to make those sales and if they want to make as many new relationships as possible with their future, potentially loyal customers. In the automobile business people flock to the Internet to shop for cars and compares prices. They tend to still buy cars from dealers, but a few now opt for an Internet purchase. Car dealers do not boycott the web, but make the best use of it they can. They try as hard as they can to make a customer once they get you into their dealership. My car dealer treats me like a prince since they realize I could go to any dealer to buy the car, but I Choose to come to them. It is their attitude and their service which makes me a loyal customer, but the price competition derived via the Internet makes me a smarter customer, too. If the dealership resents the Internet, they do a superb job of not showing their dislike, but instead, do all they can to create business. Is this what you are doing? Or, are you doing the opposite? What taste are you leaving in the mouth of your customers, or future customers? Its up to you do make the right impression. Like it or hate it, Pricescope is creating web information about one of your prime products, diamonds. A diamond can readily be bought without going to a B&M store and nothing can be done to prevent it. Now Pricescope has come upon a way to offer a degree of participation to B&M retailers, those with excellent credit, who may get diamonds from certain selected vendors, and make sales in their stores. Those who choose to participate will not get rich quick, but they can make new customers and create many future, direct sales. If you opt out, it will not hurt Pricescope, but if you opt in, you have an increased chance to meet young, smart customers. You won’t be able to charge crazy prices, but you will prepare yourself for doing future business in a tough business climate. What’s my stake in this, you might ask? Nothing at all. I am not an owner or partner in Pricescope, whatsoever. I am not a retailer and only sell old cut diamonds to the trade, not to consumers. My other firm, AGA, does many appraisals for Internet consumers, but we also do an equal or greater number for local consumers, B&M retailers and regional diamond dealers. I have no axe to grind or an agenda. My goal is to give a different point of view to this “discussion”. Everyone is entitled to make their own decision on this, but it seems wrong that Polygon members get one point of view and no other to create balance. It still is your decision, not mine. Dave Atlas
»
A moment of decision is coming
The diamond business is at a moment in time where old ideas and technology are truly meeting head on. We have the GIA and AGS about to grade the cut of a diamond based on measurements and ray tracing computations along with minor parametric grade limiting characteristics. We have several other players grading or about to grade with similar technologies. We have Gemex using six light positions in an additive way that does not mimic real world lighting and some other tools which compare data with appearance.All of this is some kind of what might be called "progress", but I have problems with using tools or software to provide answers when obvious flaws exist in these final results. The jewelry business has always been plagued with poorly executed technological "improvements". We had colorimeters of various types that were highly touted to grade color, even on mounted diamonds. Did they really work? No. Some are still being sold, but no real lab would consider them a step up from a good set of master diamonds. Now, we are about to step up in the world market with grading tools for the cut of diamonds that have inherent problems and problematic results. Why do you need to grade the light return of a diamond you are working with in the laboratory with a computational model? Why not just measure the light return with the diamond itself? Why give in to the error we all know exists in the present industry accepted measuring devices? Once a series of faulty measurments are taken how could anyone suppose the computed model would be accurate? What about the measurements computed by the device and not even measured? These will potentially be even more innaccurate. Lastly, some small measurments are not taken at all. Who is to say that these skipped measurements are not critical to an proper prediction? Admittedly, the prediction of light behavior in diamond is highly complex. This is precisely why the GIA and AGS have taken so long to get it going. Now, in the rush to get it done, I am afraid it is will be given and/or sold to the industry as if it was a perfect system when it isn't. If one wants to have the right answers to light behavior, one should use highly accurate equipment and take measurements of the light's properties directly from the diamond being graded. This eliminates any computational error and is the unique and correct measurement for that diamond. This will be the situation with the technology of ImaGem, Inc. Diamonds will be individually graded by direct performance measurement. The first of these units has been installed in my Philadelphia lab and we hope to have it operational in a few days or weeks. Many years have been spent in its development and I have been privileged to have played a small consulting role over the past eight years. It is my hope that those who make decisions in the diamond trade will allow ImaGem the opportunity to make its case and demonstrate the accuracy of directly measured light behavior. After 37 years in this business, I would like to make it the best possible business we can as we head into the future.
»
The NEW AGA Cut Class and AGA-Light Behavior Index with ImaGem
With the advent of new technology which is capable of physically measuring light behavior in diamonds, AGA will now use the new AGA Durability-Finish-Size (DFS) system when we also utilize ImaGem light measurements. The original AGA Cut Class system was based on a conservative and traditional view of how diamonds are best cut, but with light detection devices, we are able to broadly open the field for new cut styles and innovation. The original AGA Cut Class system will continue to be used in our existing AGA-CERT® format. With new technology come changes in how diamonds can be assessed for quality. Both systems are useful, but we believe the AGA-DFS system is better overall in describing diamond cut quality with light performance.
»
Screening chart for Old European Cut diamonds
How do you begin to know when an old European cut round diamond is a possibly better cut one? How do you know it is a durable stone? What paramters are undesirable? This chart may help you.
»
Making the case for Imagem diamond grading
Using the very best, and fastest tools for directly measuring Diamond Light Behaior makes good sense. Accuracy, repeatability and international interoperability; all in one package.
»
Gemstones, Diamonds and Jewelry as Investments. Are you kidding or are you really serious?
40 years of experience in the gem and jewelry business along with education in real investing leads to an article that should be read by all consumers.
»
A screening tool for all diamond grading
A shortcut method for consumers to know how much to trust what they are reading when they shop for a diamond. Also, a "standard" approach for appraisers to express the level of their own grading ability and self-confidence in a shorthand format.
»
Stuck with a Problem? Has your diamond, jewelry or gemstone deal gone sour?
How to involve an expert in curing your situation before it explodes prematurely into costly and potentially fruitless litigation.
»
60/60 or ideal cut. How do you know what to choose?
What is the ideal cut hype? What 60/60 tells you and what it leaves out? How to successfully broaden your search for a great diamond and how to afford more choices.
|
|