Categories
Search


Advanced Search
 »  Home  »  Diamond Grading  »  GIA Excellent Cut Grade: Case Study  »  Spread and perceived size
GIA Excellent Cut Grade: Case Study
by Garry Holloway | Published  14/03/2006 | Diamond Grading
Spread and perceived size
When various observers of different ages were shown the three stones and asked to rank them in size order, more than half thought the lightest shallow diamond (A) had the largest diameter; bigger even than the stone that weighs 12% more. This is probably because the light return at the edges is better as is evident in the photo on the dark background shown here again in Figure 6. OctoNus DiamCalc shows that although this stone has somewhat reduced light return from the table, the crown facet light return is very high.

Figure 6. The shallow stone on the left would be the best value if size counts.

It is true that few experts like shallow proportioned diamonds, however as a diamond retailer I know that many consumers do.

When all three stones are dirty, with the usual grease etc, then the shallow 'Very Good' stone will look the best of the three.

Article Series
Article Options
Popular Articles
  1. A review of the “foundation” of GIA’s new cut grade system
  2. USA Adventures June 2005
  3. The Diamond Industry in 2005
  4. AGS' new cut-grading of princesses: a first experience
  5. Why are there several dealers offering the exact same stone?
Popular Authors
  1. Garry Holloway
  2. Paul Slegers
  3. Neil Beaty
  4. David Atlas
  5. John Pollard